Brighton’s Plight A Post-Gazette Investigation Outbreak Two Facilities Everyone’s Sick New Model Staffing Sanctions Managing Among Worst Brighton’s Plight
Part 6
Brighton’s Plight
Kristie Park of Baden, left, comforts her friend Jodi Gill, whose father Glenn Gill contracted COVID-19 while a resident at Brighton Rehabilitation and Wellness Center. (Alexandra Wimley/Post-Gazette)
Part 6
Brighton’s Plight
Kristie Park of Baden, left, comforts her friend Jodi Gill, whose father Glenn Gill contracted COVID-19 while a resident at Brighton Rehabilitation and Wellness Center. (Alexandra Wimley/Post-Gazette)
State sanctions

Long before Brighton Rehabilitation and Wellness Center in Beaver County became widely know this year for its deadly COVID-19 outbreak, it was already on state nursing home inspectors’ radar.

During the first years that Comprehensive Healthcare owned the building, 2014 to 2017, state inspectors found increasingly serious deficiencies at Brighton.

Those deficiencies came as Comprehensive cut more and more full-time, in-house nursing staff, replacing only some of their hours with temporary, part-time agency staff.

In 2017, state investigators thought the problems had become so serious that they levied their first sanctions against Brighton’s new owners, beginning an escalating series of violations that has continued during the pandemic.

“Sanctions” are steps the state can take beyond issuing a finding of a deficiency and asking a nursing home to correct the problem.

State
sanctions
One sanction
every year
Glenn Gill, 82, left, with his daughter, Jodi, three years ago. (Photo courtesy Jodi Gill)
One sanction every year

There are three types of sanctions: The state can fine the home; it can ban it from admitting patients; it can place the home under one of four levels of “provisional” licensing that can ultimately lead to closure. Higher and higher levels of provisional licensing are assessed if problems are not corrected under the previous level after additional inspections by the state.

Between 2017 and 2019, the state levied at least one sanction against Brighton every year. And this year, the federal government took the unusual step of issuing its own sanction and fining Brighton as a result of a state inspection in May.

In the three years from 2017 through 2019, the state issued five fines against Brighton, making it one of just eight nursing homes during that time to receive five or more fines by the state.

Fines against Brighton, 2017-2019:

  • Resident fell and broke an arm.
  • Bedsores.
  • Resident's skin burned off from too-hot compress.
  • Heat not working for two days in building wing.
  • Another resident's arm broken.
Six residents with bedsores

The first two sanctions, in 2017, were fines for incidents of “actual harm” — one of four harm categories the state levels for each violation — with one fine levied after a resident broke an arm after falling off an air mattress with insufficient assistance from staff. The other 2017 fine was because six residents were found with bedsores, something that experts say demonstrates residents did not have enough care.

There was another fine after a finding of “actual harm” in 2018, when a resident’s skin was burned off his lower body by a moist compress that was too hot.

In 2019, there were two findings of “serious harm” — the most serious category — for the same incident after residents of The Grove were placed in “immediate jeopardy” because heat in the wing did not work for two days. That resulted in a fine and placement on a provisional one license.

Another fine, and placement on a provisional two license, was assessed later in 2019 after a finding of “actual harm” was given after a resident broke an arm while being moved by an employee.

Six residents
with bedsores

Largest nursing homes with five or more sanctions

Name No. of sanctions, 2017-19 Civil penalty-only sanctions Civil penalty with provisional license sanctions Provisional license-only sanctions Ban on admissions sanctions Total: all civil penalties
ManorCare Health Services - Pottsville 8 4 0 4 0 $68,500
Mountain Laurel Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 6 5 0 1 1 $59,750
Brighton Rehabilitation and Wellness Center 5 3 2 0 0 $60,500
The Gardens at Tunkhannock 5 3 1 1 0 $52,750
Hearthside Rehabilitation Center 5 3 1 1 0 $52,000
Oxford Health Center 5 4 0 1 0 $39,000
Pleasant Acres Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 5 3 0 1 1 $25,795
Inglis House 5 3 0 2 0 $  5,200

Manorcare Health Services - Pottsville

Location: Pottsville
Number of sanctions, 2017-2109: 8
Civil penalty-only sanctions: 4
Civil penalty with provisional license sanctions: $0
Provisional license-only sanctions: 4
Ban on admissions sanctions: 0
Total: all civil penalties: $68,500

Mountain Laurel Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

Location: Clearfield
Number of sanctions, 2017-2109: 6
Civil penalty-only sanctions: 5
Civil penalty with provisional license sanctions: $0
Provisional license-only sanctions: 1
Ban on admissions sanctions: 1
Total: all civil penalties: $59,750

Brighton Rehabilitation and Wellness Center

Location: Beaver
Number of sanctions, 2017-2109: 5
Civil penalty-only sanctions: 3
Civil penalty with provisional license sanctions: $2
Provisional license-only sanctions: 0
Ban on admissions sanctions: 0
Total: all civil penalties: $60,500

The Gardens at Tunkhannock

Location: Tunkhannock
Number of sanctions, 2017-2109: 5
Civil penalty-only sanctions: 3
Civil penalty with provisional license sanctions: $1
Provisional license-only sanctions: 1
Ban on admissions sanctions: 0
Total: all civil penalties: $52,750

Hearthside Rehabilitation Center

Location: State College
Number of sanctions, 2017-2109: 5
Civil penalty-only sanctions: 3
Civil penalty with provisional license sanctions: $1
Provisional license-only sanctions: 1
Ban on admissions sanctions: 0
Total: all civil penalties: $52,000

Oxford Health Center

Location: Oxford
Number of sanctions, 2017-2109: 5
Civil penalty-only sanctions: 4
Civil penalty with provisional license sanctions: $0
Provisional license-only sanctions: 1
Ban on admissions sanctions: 0
Total: all civil penalties: $39,000

Pleasant Acres Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

Location: York
Number of sanctions, 2017-2109: 5
Civil penalty-only sanctions: 3
Civil penalty with provisional license sanctions: $0
Provisional license-only sanctions: 1
Ban on admissions sanctions: 1
Total: all civil penalties: $25,795

Inglis House

Location: Philadelphia
Number of sanctions, 2017-2109: 5
Civil penalty-only sanctions: 3
Civil penalty with provisional license sanctions: $0
Provisional license-only sanctions: 2
Ban on admissions sanctions: 1
Total: all civil penalties: $5,200

Members of the Pa. National Guard walk into Brighton Rehabilitation and Wellness Center. (Andrew Rush/Post-Gazette)
Poor inspection
results
Members of the Pa. National Guard walk into Brighton Rehabilitation and Wellness Center. (Andrew Rush/Post-Gazette)
Poor inspection results

Since 2014, only 39 nursing homes in the state — just 5% of all facilities — have been placed on a provisional two license or higher (provisional three or provisional four) out of 693 nursing homes in Pennsylvania.

Those incidents and other poor inspections also led the state to nominate Brighton in February 2018 to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ nationwide Special Focus Facility list.

The list represents the worst performing nursing homes among 15,000 nationwide. Being placed on the list is a warning to facilities to work harder to achieve clean inspections so they aren’t named to the top 100, which then requires extra inspections until the nursing home shows significant improvement.

Despite beginning to hire more full-time and agency staffers in 2018 and 2019 after it went on the Special Focus Facility candidates’ list, Brighton continued to have poor inspection results and is still on the list. Only 24 other facilities on the current list of more than 400 have been on it as long as Brighton.

State inspectors continue to have a strong interest in Brighton.

In 2019, the state inspected its 693 nursing homes an average of 7.8 times, with an average of 4.7 of those inspections coming as the result of complaints from residents, staff or families — although the reports do not say where the complaints came from or what they concerned. Brighton, on the other hand, was inspected 23 times that year; 13 were as a result of complaints.

Brighton, with 589 beds, is the third-largest nursing home in the state. Size by itself could lead to more complaints and more inspections.

But its 23 inspections in 2019 were more than at any of the nine other nursing homes in the state with 400 or more beds.

Only four of those other large nursing homes had 10 or more inspections in 2019, and only one — Spring Creek in Dauphin County — had more complaint-based inspections — 15 — among its 22 overall inspections.

That trend has continued for Brighton this year.

Problems with infection prevention

Since the pandemic began in February, the state has inspected Brighton 16 times, with 13 of those the result of complaints to the state Department of Health. That is about three times as high as the average number of inspections — 4.3 — and four times as high as the number of complaint inspections — 2.9 — for the average nursing home since February.

Brighton could face additional sanctions because of deficiencies uncovered this year.

In all, three of the state’s 16 inspections at Brighton this year — as well as a federal inspection May 14 — found deficiencies. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services fined Brighton $65,300 as a result of a state inspection May 1-5. That is the only fine against Brighton announced so far this year, but it could face additional fines.

During inspections April 17, May 1-5 and May 14, problems with infection prevention compliance were discovered, state and federal reports revealed.

Between April 17 and May 28, state inspectors were on-site on 11 days, and federal inspectors were there once. That’s roughly an inspection every three or four days. At one point in April, inspectors were in the building seven days in two weeks.

Problems with
infection prevention
“Months without
  a new case”
(Andrew Rush/Post-Gazette)
“Months without a new case”

Asked why staffers were repeatedly found to be violating infection prevention protocols in the midst of a deadly outbreak, Brighton officials said in an email: “In any instance where a staff member or contractor may have gone outside of proper protocols, leadership works to immediately correct the individual to ensure compliance. Because of the hard work and dedication of staff to adhere to protocols, the facility has now gone months without a new case of COVID-19.”

Family members of residents are concerned by Brighton’s recent insistence that it hasn’t had any new cases since early on in the pandemic, when 332 of the 460 residents who lived there then tested positive for COVID-19, with at least 82 of them dying.

As Jodi Gill, daughter of Glenn Gill, 82, a resident of Brighton who tested positive and survived COVID-19, said, “They don’t have any new cases because almost everyone in the building has either died or already tested positive.”

“And that’s the saddest part of all of this.”

  Next: Managing internally

Credits

Reporting

Sean D. Hamill

Design

Daniel Marsula

Graphics

Ed Yozwick

Photography/Videography

Andrew Rush

Development

Laura Malt Schneiderman

Advertisement

Advertisement